🔗 Share this article A Rising ‘Posh-Poor Divide’: The Way Prosperity and Deprivation Now Sit Side by Side in Across England. In a postwar estate known as ‘The Nunny’, residents live in homes only a few metres from their wealthier neighbours in the adjacent Scartho village. One six-foot-tall wall literally separates the two areas in Grimsby, Lincolnshire, blocking off roads and walkways that previously linked them. “This is the posh-poor divide,” said a resident, aged 37. “It’s been like this since I’ve known. I doubt they’ll take it down because I suspect they’ll want to mix with us.” A Stark National Picture Analysis of official statistics shows the extent of disparity can run, at times across little more than a short distance of asphalt, a hedge row or a wall. Years of austerity and underinvestment mean almost two-thirds of councils now have a locality classified as one of the poorest in the nation. The spread of poverty has coincided with a sharp rise in the quantity of places where disadvantaged and well-off people end up living side by side. In 2019, only 65 of the poorest neighbourhoods adjoined one of the wealthiest. That figure increased to 119 in the most recent data. A Wall That Divides More Than Land In Grimsby, the gap is the biggest in the country and starkly apparent. The wall is much more than a symbolic division; it creates very real difficulties for daily routines. School runs that should take a quarter of an hour turn into an hour-long detour. Reaching key amenities like supermarkets, schools and care homes is hindered. The area can attract antisocial behaviour, with reports of litter being dumped over the wall and other problems. “People strive to have a well-kept home and garden, and then you live opposite that,” noted one local, motioning at the rusted barricade. Community Spirit Amidst Hardship Within a local community centre, workers stress that support does not recognise addresses. “Where you live doesn’t necessarily indicate your level of challenge,” explained director Tracey Good. Regardless of being placed in the most deprived 10% for income, employment, education, health and crime, the estate retains a fierce loyalty and feeling of community among its inhabitants. Meanwhile, Scartho ranks among the least deprived 10% overall. A Similar Story: Stanhope in Ashford This pattern is mirrored nationally. The Stanhope estate in Ashford, Kent, a mid-century housing development, is in the 10% most deprived of neighbourhoods in England. It is immediately adjacent by spacious houses built in the early 2000s that sit in the top 10% for employment and quality of surroundings. “They might have larger properties, but here there’s more community,” said Phil Hockley, aged 63. “It’s likely many people in the new builds never even talk to each other.” The financial gap is clear: an average three-bedroom house costs about £275,000 on the Stanhope estate, while on the other side comparable properties fetch about £410,000. Residents speak of a tangible feeling of being overlooked. “Our neighbourhood gets ignored,” said resident Susan. “In this area our facilities have gradually disappeared, and most of the issues we face here are to do with financial hardship.” The increase in these ‘deprivation divides’ paints a picture of an increasingly segregated society, where prosperity and deprivation are frequently awkwardly in close proximity.
In a postwar estate known as ‘The Nunny’, residents live in homes only a few metres from their wealthier neighbours in the adjacent Scartho village. One six-foot-tall wall literally separates the two areas in Grimsby, Lincolnshire, blocking off roads and walkways that previously linked them. “This is the posh-poor divide,” said a resident, aged 37. “It’s been like this since I’ve known. I doubt they’ll take it down because I suspect they’ll want to mix with us.” A Stark National Picture Analysis of official statistics shows the extent of disparity can run, at times across little more than a short distance of asphalt, a hedge row or a wall. Years of austerity and underinvestment mean almost two-thirds of councils now have a locality classified as one of the poorest in the nation. The spread of poverty has coincided with a sharp rise in the quantity of places where disadvantaged and well-off people end up living side by side. In 2019, only 65 of the poorest neighbourhoods adjoined one of the wealthiest. That figure increased to 119 in the most recent data. A Wall That Divides More Than Land In Grimsby, the gap is the biggest in the country and starkly apparent. The wall is much more than a symbolic division; it creates very real difficulties for daily routines. School runs that should take a quarter of an hour turn into an hour-long detour. Reaching key amenities like supermarkets, schools and care homes is hindered. The area can attract antisocial behaviour, with reports of litter being dumped over the wall and other problems. “People strive to have a well-kept home and garden, and then you live opposite that,” noted one local, motioning at the rusted barricade. Community Spirit Amidst Hardship Within a local community centre, workers stress that support does not recognise addresses. “Where you live doesn’t necessarily indicate your level of challenge,” explained director Tracey Good. Regardless of being placed in the most deprived 10% for income, employment, education, health and crime, the estate retains a fierce loyalty and feeling of community among its inhabitants. Meanwhile, Scartho ranks among the least deprived 10% overall. A Similar Story: Stanhope in Ashford This pattern is mirrored nationally. The Stanhope estate in Ashford, Kent, a mid-century housing development, is in the 10% most deprived of neighbourhoods in England. It is immediately adjacent by spacious houses built in the early 2000s that sit in the top 10% for employment and quality of surroundings. “They might have larger properties, but here there’s more community,” said Phil Hockley, aged 63. “It’s likely many people in the new builds never even talk to each other.” The financial gap is clear: an average three-bedroom house costs about £275,000 on the Stanhope estate, while on the other side comparable properties fetch about £410,000. Residents speak of a tangible feeling of being overlooked. “Our neighbourhood gets ignored,” said resident Susan. “In this area our facilities have gradually disappeared, and most of the issues we face here are to do with financial hardship.” The increase in these ‘deprivation divides’ paints a picture of an increasingly segregated society, where prosperity and deprivation are frequently awkwardly in close proximity.